Balachandran. G v. The Chairman

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner is employed in the respondent bank. He is under suspension since 22.03.2018. Any order of suspension has to be periodically reviewed. The petitioner is permitted to give a representation to the Management for revoking the order of suspension and for reinstatement. The Management shall consider the said representation on merits and pass appropriate order within a period of three weeks after receipt of the same.

3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

23.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Grama Bank, Yercard Main Road, Hasthampatti, Salem – 636 007.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Grama Bank, Yercard Main Road, Hasthampatti, Salem – 636 007.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.5987 of 2023

23.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.5987 of 2023 G.Balachandran ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Grama Bank, Yercard Main Road, Hasthampatti, Salem – 636 007. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Grama Bank, Yercard Main Road, Hasthampatti, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records (Erstwhile Pandian Grama Bank) in his impugned order in AIVD/1009/17-18 dated 22.03.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Assistant Manager in the Arasarai Branch, Madurai within the stipulated period by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Standing Counsel