VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Loganathan.G v. The Reserve Bank of India

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 September 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8218/2021

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed for Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to issue directions to the third and fourth respondents to act upon the petitioner's loan repayment proposal within the scope of fair practice code and to close the loan outstanding as against the petitioner after receiving the actual loan outstanding as stated in the petitioner's representation dated

09.03.2021.

¶2The prayer in the Writ Petition cannot be granted. The relief lies before the Banking Ombudsman or before the Consumer Court. Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to submit an application before appropriate forum and seek remedy.

¶3With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

22.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Sml

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Sml

22.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY G.Loganathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Reserve Bank of India, Represented through its Secretary, Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. 2.The General Manager, Department of Supervision (NBFCs) of RBI, Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. 3.The Regional Business head, Sri Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd., No.270, Allahabad Bank Upstairs, Near Income Tax Office, Sekkalai, Karaikudi-630 001. 4.The Branch Manager, Sri Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd., No.270, Allahabad Bank Upstairs, Near Income Tax Office, Sekkalai, Karaikudi-630 001. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to issue directions to the third and fourth respondents to act upon the petitioner's loan repayment proposal within the scope of fair practice code to close the loan outstanding as against the petitioner after receiving the actual loan outstanding as stated in the petitioner's representation dated 09.03.2021. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.