VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Iyyappan v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Dcb

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 April 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 6407/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence made in C.C.No.279 of 2006 dated 11.03.2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil as confirmed by judgment dated 30.01.2026 made in C.A.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Sessions Fast Track Mahila Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil pending disposal of the above criminal revision.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court on 11.03.2010, and the trial Court sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years each, for the offence under Sections 420 and 468 of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.250/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months each, and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years each, for the offence under Sections 465 and 471 of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 250/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months each concurrently on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil.

¶3The learned Sessions Fast Track Mahila Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil confirmed the conviction, and confirmed the sentence and dismissed the Criminal Appeal No.18 of 2010 dated 30.01.2026. Challenging the same, the present Criminal Revision Case has been filed before this Court along with this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking suspension of sentence.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are several infirmities in the prosecution case, and also there are contradictions in material particulars between the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

¶5This Court has carefully considered the rival contentions put forward by either side and also perused the materials available on record.

¶6The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that there are certain infirmities and inconsistencies in this case, and also there are certain contradictions in material particulars. He also submitted that this Court passed an order directing the petitioner to surrender by 08.04.2026 vide order dated

25.03.2026. Pursuant to which, the petitioner had surrendered before the learned trial Court. The fact remains that there are arguable points involved in this criminal revision and further, the criminal revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and as such, and also considering the fact that the petitioner has good chance of succeeding in the revision petition, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner herein is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

¶7Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the revision with the following directions :

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil;

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; and

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, on all working days at

10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶8Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the Aishwaryam Trust, Indian Bank, Tirunagar Branch, Madurai, Account No.6639017788, IFSC Code: IDIB000T032, within a period of one week from today.

¶9Post for reporting compliance after four weeks.

09.04.2026 gbg Note : Issue order copy on 09.04.2026. To

1.The Sessions Fast Track Mahila Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil.

3.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

5.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai.

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ., oooooooooooooooooo gbg oo Crl.oMP(MD)No.6407oofo2026 in CRLoRC(MD)No.534oofo2026 oooooooooooooo

09.04.2026 (2/3)

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL MP(MD) No.6407 of 2026 in CRL RC(MD) No.534 of 2026 Iyyappan ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.28/2003) ... Respondent Prayer : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 377(1) of Cr.P.C., (U/s. 438(i) of BNSS) to suspend the sentence made in C.C.No.279 of 2006 dated 11.03.2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil and as confirmed by judgment dated 30.01.2026 made in C.A.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Sessions Fast Track Mahila Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil pending disposal of the above criminal revision. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Russel Raj For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Criminal)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.