VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Selvaraj. N.S v. The Authorized Officer

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 6401/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J) Challenge is to the E-Auction Sale Notice dated 02.03.2023 issued by the respondent bank.

2.Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent bank. He would submit that yesterday was the last date for submitting the bids and the bank has not received any bid till yesterday. Hence, the impugned notice itself has become infructuous.

3.Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [R.S.M., J.] & [L.V.G., J.]

24.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes skn R.SUBRAMANIAN., J AND L.VICTORIA GOWRI.,J skn and W.M.P(MD)No.6055 of 2023

24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P(MD)No.6055 of 2023 N.S.Selvaraj : Petitioner Vs. The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Palani Branch, Dindigul District – 624 601. : Respondent PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 02.03.2023 issued by the respondent bank and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan For Respondents : Mr.R.Pandivel Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.