VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Raja. P v. The Chief Judicial Magistrate

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 March 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 7006/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel, takes notice for the respondent – Bank.

¶2The order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.

¶3Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent – Bank, would submit that the secured asset was already sold on

23.02.2023 and the sale has also been confirmed.

¶4We, therefore, do not see any reason to entertain this writ petition. Hence, reserving the liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned Debts Recovery Tribunal, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

29.03.2023 (2/2) NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.6624 & 6625 of 2023

29.03.2023 (2/2)

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.6624 & 6625 of 2023 1.P.Raja 2.L.Shanthi ... Petitioners -vs- 1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagercoil Kanyakumari District 2.The Authorized Officer Union Bank of India Karungal Branch No.18/B1, Karumavilai Opp CSI Home Church Karungal, Kanyakumari District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in Cr.M.P.No.14474 of 2022, dated 12.01.2023 and quash the same and consequently directing the second respondent to handover the physical possession of the secured property to the petitioner within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Cenil For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.