VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Saroja v. The Secretary and Personnel Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 March 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7214/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.11.2025 for reconveyance of the lands comprised in Old Survey No.714/2, presently Town Survey Nos.223/1 and 223/3, Block No.36, Ward BM, Kulavanigarpuram Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that the subject lands were acquired for the purpose of the Housing Board by an Award dated 10.07.1989 and, according to the petitioner, the same have not been utilised for the intended public purpose till date. On that basis, the petitioner has submitted a representation seeking reconveyance of the lands, which remains unconsidered.

¶3The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Housing Board submitted that, pursuant to the acquisition, possession of the lands was taken and handed over to the Housing Board, and a scheme known as the "Neighbourhood Scheme" has been formed, under which several plots have already been sold. Therefore, it cannot be contended that the lands have not been put to public use.

¶4In view of the above factual position, it is evident that the acquired lands have been put to use for the intended public purpose. Hence, the request for reconveyance cannot be entertained.

¶5Recording the same, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶6Insofar as the issue relating to compensation is concerned, if the petitioner has not received the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law. The petitioner is at liberty to make appropriate representations after verifying the records with the Land Acquisition Authority and the jurisdictional Civil Court, as to whether the compensation amount has already been received by her predecessor-in-interest or deposited before the competent Court. The petitioner's right, if any, as a legatee in respect of the compensation amount is left open.

17.03.2026

smn2 To:-

1.The Secretary and Personnel Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB), Head Office, CMDA Tower III Building, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107.

2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli-9.

3.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Tirunelveli – 11. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

smn2

17.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Saroja ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Secretary and Personnel Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB), Head Office, CMDA Tower III Building, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107. 2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli- 9. 3.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Tirunelveli – 11. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.11.2025 for re-conveyance of the lands acquired in Old Survey No.714/2, present Town Survey Nos.223/1, 223/3, Block No.36, Ward BM, Kulavanigarpuram Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District, within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.S.Velmurugan Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.