- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 April 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 5662/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry without following due process of law.
2.It appears that the private respondent, who is the brother of the first wife of the third petitioner herein alleged to have made some sort of objection for the marriage to be performed between the second petitioner and the first petitioner herein, due to some age difference. The second petitioner is also present before this Court and stated that with her consent only the above said marriage has been performed. The first petitioner is stated to be the own brother of the third petitioner.
3.Considering the above said situation of the petitioners, let the above said complaint given by the private respondents may be closed by the second respondent.
4.With the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of.
12.04.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Inspector of Police, Keelarajakulamangalam Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Erichanatham Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM
12.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1.Maheswaran 2.Raja Murugalakshmi 3.Sundhara Mahalingam 4.Manimegalai ... Petitioners Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Inspector of Police, Keelarajakulamangalam Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Erichanatham Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 4.Palanivel Murugan 5.Manikandan .... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to issue direction directing the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry without following due process of law. For petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for R1 to R3 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.