VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muniasamy.M v. The Dist.Collector

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 June 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9149/2021

Judgment

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 18.04.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

09.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office,

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office,

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Paramakudi,

4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Officer, Muthukulathur,

P.T.ASHA, J. abr Dated: 09.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.6896 of 2021 and 1184 of 2023 M.Muniasamy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Paramakudi, 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Officer, Muthukulathur, 5.Bharathi Raja (Police Constable), S/o.Subramanian, Thoori Village, Muthukulathur Taluk, 6.Chellasamy Selvi (Sub Inspector of Police), S/o.Palani Thevar, Thoori Village, Muthukulathur Taluk, .. Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order passed by the third respondent dated 17.09.2018 in Pa.Mu.B3(2)/3981/2017 and quash the same as illegal consequently and directing the third respondent to pass orders afresh after giving the petitioner adequate opportunity to be heard in the case pertaining to Survey No.146/1 within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : No appearance For RR1 To 4 : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.