- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 March 2026
- Bench
- S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP Crl.(MD) 1417/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second Respondent to conduct an enquiry and take necessary action against the private respondent in the light of the petition forwarded by the first Respondent vide No.HLG/26076903 dated 22.03.2026 and conclude the same within time frame as fixed by this Court.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent is the paramour of the petitioner's wife. The petitioner had married one Krishnaveni and out of the said wedlock, they were also blessed with a female child, namely Priyadarshini, aged about 4 1/2 years. The said Krishnaveni had developed intimacy with the third respondent and had left out from her matrimonial home deserting the petitioner and is presently living with the third respondent. Due to which the petitioner's father in law, that is the father of the petitioner's wife, husband, petitioner's father in law, that is the father of Krishnaveni, namely Ramakrishnan had lodged a complaint on 10/6/2025, before the second respondent police and on enquiry, the second respondent Police had secured the petitioner's wife as well as his child on 19.06.2025. Even thereafter, deserting the petitioner as well as the child, she had ran away with the third respondent. In the interregnum, the third respondent had forcibly entered into the petitioner's house on 21.02.2026 in his absence at about 3:00 pm and had taken away the petitioner's minor daughter. Immediately the petitioner had lodged a complaint to the first respondent on 23.02.2026 and the same was forwarded to the second respondent. However, no action was taken on the petitioner's complaint.
¶3The learned Government Advocate submitted that already the petitioner's complaint was enquired and when the child had expressed her reluctance to go with the father.
¶4Heard either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.
¶5In view of the submission, made by the learned Government Advocate, giving liberty to the petitioner to file a Guardian OP, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
12.03.2026 NCC : Index : pnn To
¶1The Superintendent of Police,, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station, Manur, Tirunelveli District. WPoCRL.(MD).oNo.1417oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL.oVICTORIAoGOWRI,J ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopnn oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooWPoCRL.(MD)oNo.1417oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o12/03/2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 12/03/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI S.Gopal ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station, Manur, Tirunelveli District. 3. Murugesan ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to conduct an enquiry and take necessary action against the Private Respondent in the light of the petition forwarded by the 1st Respondent vide No.HLG/26076903 dated 22.03.2026 and conclude the same within time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : D.S.Haroon Rasheed, Advocate. For Respondent : M.Sakthi Kumar for R1 and R2 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.