VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jeganmohanraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 March 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 1466/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection while survey and demarcate the petitioner's property in S.Nos.243/2A, 243, 2C and 244/4G situated at F.Kilaiyur Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District, by the respondents 3 and 4 by considering the petitioner's representation dated

04.02.2026.

¶2Considering that no adverse order is likely to be passed against the respondents 5 to 11, notice to them is dispensed with.

3.This writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. It is open to any aggrieved party to move this Court either by way of review or recall of this order, if there is any suppression of material facts by the petitioner.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

(I) The petitioner is directed to submit his application in on-line mode. The survey authority will scrutinize if the application submitted by the petitioner is in order.

(II) The petitioner will have to enclose all the relevant documents such as patta.

(III) The survey authority will issue notice to the writ petitioner, as well as the adjacent land owners and also to the interested persons, if any, including the private respondents.

(IV) Enquiry shall be held. During enquiry, objections raised by the adjacent land owners / interested persons shall be considered.

(V) If according to the jurisdictional authority, the objections are without any basis, the same shall be overruled and the objectors shall be informed accordingly. But the survey will be conducted only after a period of six weeks so that the objectors can move the concerned Court for injunction. If before the proposed date of survey, the objectors are unable to obtain any injunction order, the survey can very well go on.

(VI) It is open to the parties to serve memo of instructions to the surveyor at the time of conducting survey. The same will be borne in mind. While it cannot be binding on the surveyor, the same will be taken note of.

(VII) If the jurisdictional authority finds objections to be having substance, then, he shall call upon the applicants to move the jurisdictional civil Court for agitating their rights.

(VIII) If required, the respondent police is directed to afford necessary police protection on payment of necessary charges in terms of GO.Ms.No.139, Home (Pol-VIII) Department, dated 04.03.2019.

(IX) The survey authority will conclude the entire exercise one way or the other within a period of six weeks after service of notice on the interested persons.

(X) A copy of the survey report along with sketch will be served on the parties.

27.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Rmk TO:-

1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai, Trichy District.

4.The Firka Surveyor, Pannapatti, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

¶5The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Rmk Dated

27.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Jeganmohanraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep., by the Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai, Trichy District. 4.The Firka Surveyor, Pannapatti, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 5.Appavu 6.Singaravelan 7.Velu 8.Raja 9.Kandasami 10.Rajan 11.Rasu ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection while survey and demarcate the petitioner's property in S.Nos.243/2A, 243, 2C and 244/4G situated at F.Kilaiyur Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District, by the respondents 3 and 4 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2026. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (crl.side) For R3 & R4 : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate (Civil side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.