VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Mohammed Ghouse Thaikka v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6780/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

O R D E R The writ petition is filed, challenging the impugned order dated

21.03.2023. By the impugned order, even though the petitioner is recognized as a hereditary Mutawalli, the time period is fixed up to

13.03.2026. The same is now going to expire and therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court on the last day.

¶2Mr.K.Jeyamohan, learned Standing Counsel, taking notice on behalf of the Wak Board, would submit that it is true that in certain judgments, it has been held that in respect of hereditary Mutawalli, the time period need not be fixed, but at the same time when orders were passed in the year 2023, the petitioner accepted the same and did not raise any objection.

¶3In view thereof, it is submitted that he can once again make a fresh application and this time while recognizing, the Waqf Board will appropriately apply its mind and will not impose any outer time limit.

¶4In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed on the following terms:

(a) The petitioner shall once again make a fresh application to continue/recognize him as the hereditary Mutawalli;

(b)As and when such an application is made, the first respondent Board shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass orders thereon, and due application of mind shall be made with reference to the period that is being fixed;

(c) In the meanwhile, the petitioner will be entitled to continue as the Mutawalli;

(d)Needless to mention that the due procedure, including obtaining the No Objection Certificate from the other interested parties, such as the siblings of the petitioner, shall be obtained by the petitioner and be submitted along with the application; and

(e) No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. NCC : Yes/No

12.03.2026 apd To

¶1The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep Through its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai.

¶2The Superintendent of Waqf, No.51/80, KOP Complex, Kulavanigarouram Road, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli – 627001. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

.,J.

apd ORDER MADE IN

12.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :12.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.5608 & 5609 of 2026 Mohammed Ghouse Thaikka, rep. through its Mutawalli Janab.K.Shafi Ahamed Khan. ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep Through its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai. 2. The Superintendent of Waqf, No.51/80, KOP Complex, Kulavanigarouram Road, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli – 627001. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Se.Mu.No.9846/22/AA1/Thiveli dated 21.03.2023 and quash the same insofar as the condition No.1 alone restricting the period of Mutawalliship and consequently, recognize the right of Hereditary Mutawlli until the lifetime or removal as contemplated under law. For Petitioner : Mr. H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.K.Jeyamohan Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.