VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Sundararaj v. The Govt of Tamilnadu

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7407/2020

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition and also circulated a letter to the Registry.

¶2Permission is granted. This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Collegiate Education, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Thirunelveli Region, Gandhi Nagar, Thirunelveli & District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.6859 of 2020

05.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.6859 of 2020 S.Sundararaj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State represented by The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Collegiate Education, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3.The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Thirunelveli Region, Gandhi Nagar, Thirunelveli & District. 4.Manonmaniyam Sundaranar University, Represented by the Registrar, Thirunelveli & District. 5.Sivanthi Adhitanar College, Represented by its Secretary, Pillayarpuram, Manikettipottal Post, Nagercoil Taluk, Kanniyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the fifth respondent in his order dated 31.5.2020 relieving the petitioner from service and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to extend the retirement age of the petitioner from 58 years to 59 years in consonance with G.O.(Ms).No.51 Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department dated 07.05.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balasundaram For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.Karthik for M/s.Ajmal Associates for R.4 Mr.M.P.Senthil for R.5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.