VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pappathi @ Rukkumani v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 March 2023
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6687/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Let me not keep the writ petition pending.

¶2The writ petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus seeking a direction against the second respondent, to complete the drainage channel construction work in Sinna Karadu West Side Street, Thangachiyammapatti, Dindigul District.

¶3The learned Special Government Pleader had taken notice on behalf of the first respondent and the learned Additional Government Pleader had taken notice on behalf of the second and third respondents.

¶4The petitioner is residing at Door No.2/147, Vayakati, Thottam, Thangachiyammapatti, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. It is stated that the drainage channel had been constructed and it is left open in front of the residence of the petitioner herein.

¶5It is not only the petitioner's house, but in the entire road it has been kept open. It can be closed only when there are funds available with the Panchayat. The funds will be allocated by distribution Statewise and then distributed District wise and then distributed Taluk wise. So only when the panchayat gets the funds, the drainage channel can be closed. The petitioner can also come forward to close the drainage, after addressing the panchayat and getting necessary permission.

¶6The Court cannot issue a Mandamus in the absence of funds available with the respondents 2 and 3.

¶7The writ petition stands disposed of by giving an alternate to the petitioner, for himself to close the drainage, after getting necessary permission from the third respondent/ panchayat. The other alternate is for the panchayat to close it, but only when the funds are allocated for this specific work for which no time limit can be given. No costs.

29.03.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No rm To

1.The District Collector Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Block Development Officer Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.

3.The President Thangachiyammapatti Village Panchayat, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. rm

29.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Pappathi @ Rukkumani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Block Development Officer Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The President Thangachiyammapatti Village Panchayat, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to complete the drainage channel construction work in Sinna Karadu West Side Street at Thangachiyammapatti, Dindigul District and to regulate the drainage water and ensure that there would be no stagnated of drainage water in front of the petitioner house situated in Door No.2/147, Vayakati, Thottam, Thanagachiyammapatti, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District - 624 612 based on the petitioner's representation, dated 06.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Murugapandi For Respondents : Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan - for R1 Additional Government Pleader Mr.D.Sasi Kumar - for R2 & R3 Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.