- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 April 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8103/2023
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
¶2The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is given liberty to file an appeal before the authority under Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishment Act, 1947. If within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, such an appeal under Section 41 of the Act is filed before the appellate authority, the same shall be entertained and numbered and disposed of on merits and in accordance with law after notice to the management within a period of five months thereafter. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi NOTE:Registry is directed to return the impugned order in original to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
11.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.7469 of 2023 A.Kirubanatham ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Khadi and Village Industries Commission, No.236, Avvaishanmugam Road, Kopalapuram, Chennai. 2.The Secretary, Thanjavur West Sarothaya Sangam, No.28, Giri Road, Srinivasapuram, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned order vide in TWSS Ref.No.0825/2022-23, dated 20.01.2023 passed by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and erroneous forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabakaran
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.