VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

C. Geetha Bright, v. P. Amutha, I.A.S.,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 July 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
SUB A(MD) 119/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Contempt Jurisdiction) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY SUB A(MD). No.119 of 2023 in Cont.Pet.(MD)No.873 of 2022 in Writ Petition(MD)No.5979 of 2009 C. Geetha Bright ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs

¶1P. Amutha, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

¶2Praveen P. Nair. I.A.S., Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

¶3Sh.M. Aravind, I.A.S., District Collector, Kanyakumari District,3 Nagercoil .... Contemnors/Respondents

Prayer in Sub Application(MD)No.119 of 2023 :- This Sub Application Petition filed under section 151 of C.P.C to re-open the Contempt proceedings filed in Contempt Petition (MD).No. 873 of 2022. Prayer in Contempt Petition(MD)No.873 of 2022 :- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Contemnor for his wanton and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No. 5979 of 2009 dated 22.04.2013. Prayer in WP(MD). 5979/ 2009 :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the reocrds Vide no.5575/E3/09-1, dated 08.05.2009, on the file of the 1st Respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the petitioners case for permanent absorption in the cadre of Road Inspector, Grade-II/ Overseer or any other equivalent post based on the Petitioners qualification and acquired eligiblity within the time limit. ORDER:- This Sub Application Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr.Veerakathiravan, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.M.Ramesh, Government Advocate for the respondents Nos. 1 to 3, this Court made the following order: This Petition is allowed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) // True Copy // /09/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) TO

¶1The Secretary to Government Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Chennai -600 009.

¶2Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶3The District Collector, Kanyakumari District Nagercoil. Copy to:

1.The Registrar(Judicial) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

2.The Section Officer, Contempt Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.G.THALAIMUTHARASU, Advocate ( SR-36625[F] dated 01/08/2023 )

ORDER DATED : 28/07/2023

==========================

ORDER

==========================

SUB A(MD). No.119 of 2023 in

Cont.Pet.(MD)No.873 of 2022

in

Writ Petition(MD)No.5979 of 2009 Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

AMS/01.09.2023 3P 7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.