Krishnakumar v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that History Sheet is maintained against the petitioner in H.S.No.119 of 2002 and only for surveillance purpose, enquiry has been undertaken, except that there was no proposal to initiate the proceedings under Section 110 Cr.P.C.

¶3The Histroy Sheet maintained against the petitioner is still in force. If the petitioner is aggrieved over the retention of the above said History Sheet, he can workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings. Except surveillance, no other harrasment is made to the petitioner.

¶4Recording the statement given by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed as unnecessary.

29.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

Indu Dated: 29.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Krishnakumar ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of the enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vinothkumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)