- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7566/2022
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Registrar (Administration), District Registration Office, Ariyalur District.
2.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Lalgudi, Trichy District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
30.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.5734 of 2022 Mohanasundari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Administration), District Registration Office, Ariyalur District. 2.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 3.G.Hariharan 4.Manickam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.6714/A4/2021 dated 18.02.2022 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the proceedings. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondents : Mr.M.Sidharthan, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2. Mr.T.Selvakumaran for R4. No appearance for R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.