VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Kamarunnisa Begum, v. T.Anbu Murugan

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2023
Bench
R. Suresh Kumarauthor, R.Vijayakumar
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 657/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 20.01.2023 made in W.P.(MD) No.27402 of 2022.

¶2Despite the orders passed by this Court, it is the allegation of the petitioner that, construction was going on, therefore, he was triggered to file this Contempt Petition.

¶3However, after notice, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that construction was started long back and the moment they received the Court notice, they stopped it. In order to establish the said fact, the photographs taken three months back, according to the learned counsel for the respondent, has been produced before this Court.

¶4On perusal we find that, there has been no recent construction, especially, after filing the contempt petition and in this context, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has assured that, as observed in the order dated 20.01.2023 made in the Writ Petition, the respondent has already approached by filing application to get approval from the concerned planning authority and the said application is still pending and it is to be persuaded and only after getting proper approval and planning sanction from the competant authority under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planing Act, 1971, further construction would be commenced, before which, the construction would not be commenced, he has contended. The said undertaking given by the learned counsel, who appeared on behalf of the respondent is hereby taken on record.

¶5In view of the said categorical assertion made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, recording the same, we close the Contempt Petition for the present with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same, in case if there is any further violation of the orders of this Court.

¶6In view of the closing of the Contempt Petition, the statutory notice, which has already been given to the respondent to appear before this Court on 06.06.2023, where the case could not be listed, stands terminated. (R.S.K., J.) & (R.V, J.)

08.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No SJ

R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. SJ Cont. P. (MD) No.657 of 2023

08.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Cont. P. (MD) No.657 of 2023 in W.P.(MD) No.26867 of 2022 K.Kamarunnisa Begum ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. T.Anbu Murugan ... Contemnor / 6th Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, praying to punish the Respondent for the wilful disobedience of the orders of the Hon'ble Court made in Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No.27402 of 2022 order dated 20.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.