- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9734/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This writ petition has been filed directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry on the basis of the representation dated 23.02.2023 and further directing the first respondent to take legal action against the fourth respondent within the time period that may be fixed by this Court.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the fourth respondent has mistakenly registered a false offence against the petitioner's vehicle. Therefore, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the charges against the petitioner and the same was not considered so far. Therefore, the present petition has been filed.
¶3When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that based upon the representation given by the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken against the training Sub Inspector of Police. During the course of the enquiry, it was found that the above said charges have been mistakenly made by the above said training Sub Inspector of Police. Therefore, recommendation was made to alter the charges that was framed against the petitioner and also the departmental proceedings have been initiated against the training Sub Inspector of Police. The copy of the proceedings is also produced before this Court.
¶4Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, nothing survives for further adjudication and hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.
08.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No tta To
1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Chathirakudi Police Station, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
4.Nagarajan, The Sub Inspector of Police, Chathirakudi Police Station, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
5.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District.
6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J tta Dated : 08.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN A.Muhammed Syed Meera ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Chathirakudi Police Station, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.Nagarajan, The Sub Inspector of Police, Chathirakudi Police Station, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent. PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry on the basis of the representation dated 23.02.2023 and further directing the first respondent to take legal action against the fourth respondent within the time period that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Yasar Arafath For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.