VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sh.Samkiruba v. The Deputy Inspector General

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 July 2023
Bench
K.K. Ramakrishnanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 5911/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for issuing direction to forbear the 2nd respondent from harassing the petitioner in the name of the enquiry and also from compelling the petitioner to adduce false evidence as per his direction in connection with the First Information Report in Crime No. 1 of 2017 under Section 392 r/w. 397 IPC, 331, 168, 506(i & ii), 348, 468 IPC r/w. Section 5 of Antiquity and Art Treasuries Act, 1972 Section 166-A (a), 166-A(b), 166-A(c) IPC r/w. Section 166 IPC r/w. Section 27 of Arm Act, 1959 pending investigation on the file of the 2nd respondent.

¶2The petitioner is one of the witnesses in RC 14(S) / 2022-CBI/SC-II / New Delhi. After examination of the witness, now, the Investigating Officer in order to further examine the petitioner issued the summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., on 13.03.2023.

¶3It is a case of the petitioner that under the guise of enquiry the respondents police threatened the petitioner and hence, he filed a petition seeking protection from harassing on the file of the 2nd respondent police.

¶4According to the learned Special Public Prosecutor Central Bureau of Investigation cases, the witness is called for some clarification and they are going to complete the investigation within the short span of time.

¶5At this stage, this Court considering the rival submission and in the interest of both parties is inclined to dispose this petition with the following direction: "The respondent police even still wants to enquire the petitioner, issue proper summons. On receipt of the summon, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police with the assistance of Advocate."

¶6With the above Direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

04.07.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No trp To

1.The Deputy Inspector General Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crime – 1, 2nd Floor, 5-B, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.

2.The Inspector of Police / AIO, CBI, Special Crime -1, New Delhi, (Attached in Special Crime -II) Camp Office, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN. J., trp Crl.O.P(MD).No.5911 of 2023 Dated : 04.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P(MD).No.5911 of 2023 Sh. Samkiruba ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crime – 1, 2nd Floor, 5-B, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 2.The Inspector of Police / AIO, CBI, Special Crime -1, New Delhi, (Attached in Special Crime -II) Camp Office, Madurai. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to issue a direction by forbearing the 2nd respondent from harassing the petitioner in the name of enquiry and also from compelling the petitioner to adduce false evidence as per his direction in connection with the First Information Report in Crime No. 1 of 2017 under Section 392 r/w. 397 IPC, 331, 168, 506(i & ii), 348, 468 IPC r/w. Section 5 of Antiquity and Art Treasuries Act, 1972 Section 166-A (a), 166-A(b), 166-A(c) IPC r/w. Section 166 IPC r/w. Section 27 of Arm Act, 1959 pending investigation on the file of the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : C.M.Arumugam For Respondent : Mr.N. Mohideen Basha Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.