Sivamurugan v. The District Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry.

¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that no complaint has been registered against the petitioners. He would further submit that the petitioners only given a complaint against the 3rd respondent and on that basis only notice issued to them. But, they did not appear for enquiry and no harassment has been made by the respondents.

¶3Since no complaint has been registered against the petitioners and that they have only given a complaint against the 3rd respondent nothing survives for further direction or consideration in this petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

31.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : trp To

¶1The District Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Theni Police Station, Theni.

¶3Ganasekar J. Enterprises, J. Rithika Enterprises, East Santhai, Theni.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J trp Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6021 of 2023 Dated : 31.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.03.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1. Sivamurugan 2. Umamaheswari ...Petitioners Vs. 1. State represented by, The District Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Theni Police Station, Theni. 3. Ganasekar J. Enterprises, J. Rithika Enterprises, East Santhai, Theni. ...Respondent PRAYER: This Criminal Petition is filed U/s.482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondent no.2 not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.J. Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor