VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Partheepan @ Partheeban v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Thondi

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 March 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 6004/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed in SC No.10 of 2022, dated 14.05.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District, confirmed in C.A.No.32 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram District.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court on 14.05.2025 for the offence under Section 294(b) and 326 of IPC and the trial Court sentenced him to undergo rigourous imprisonment for three years and to pay the fine amount of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months, for the offence under Section 326 of IPC and also to pay the fine amount of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month, for the offence under Section 294(b) of IPC in SC No.10 of 2022 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram District, confirmed the conviction and sentence, and dismissed C.A.No.32 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025. Challenging the same, the present Criminal Revision Case has been filed before this Court along with this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking suspension of sentence.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are several infirmities in the prosecution case, and also there are contradictions in material particulars between the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

¶5This Court has carefully considered the rival contentions put forward by either side and also perused the materials available on record.

¶6The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that there are certain infirmities and inconsistencies in this case, and also there are certain contradictions in material particulars. The fact remains that there are arguable points involved in this criminal revision and further, the criminal revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and as such, and also considering the bonafide expressed by the petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner herein is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

¶7Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the revision with the following directions :

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District;

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; and

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court, on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

(iv) The learned trial Court shall re-deposit the said sum in a Nationalised Bank, so that, the amount accrues interest and the same can be disbursed depending upon the outcome of the Criminal Revision Case in Crl.R.C.(MD)No. 499 of 2026.

¶8Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of WAA Cornelia Sorabjee Lecture Series, A/C No.6687756541, IFSC Code:IDIB000H040, within a period of one week from today.

¶9Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent.

¶10List the matter after four weeks.

18.03.2026 sm (2/3) To:-

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ. oooooooooooooooooo sm oo Crl.oMP(MD)No.6004oofo2026 in CRLoRC(MD)No.499oofo2026 (2/3) oooooooooooooo

18.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL MP(MD) No.6004 of 2026 in CRL RC(MD) No.499 of 2026 Partheepan @ Partheeban ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent (Crime No.100 of 2020) PRAYER: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner and enlarge on bail in view of the judgment made in C.A.No.32 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram District preferred against the judgment made in SC No.10 of 2022, dated 14.05.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji Nivas For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.