- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7003/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2This writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
23.11.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.7003 OF 2023 To:
¶1The Commercial Tax Officer / State Tax Officer, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.
¶2The Branch Manager, The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd., Dindigul Branch, Plot No.2, 1st Street, Pandian Nagar, Dindigul – 264 001.
¶3The Sub Registrar, Nilakottai Sub Registration Office, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.7003 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.7003 of 2023
23.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
1 W.P.(MD)NO.7003 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.7003 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)Nos.6618 & 6619 of 2023 1. S.Muthukumar 2. G.Sasikumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Commercial Tax Officer / State Tax Officer, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. 2. The Branch Manager, The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd., Dindigul Branch, Plot No.2, 1st Street, Pandian Nagar, Dindigul – 264 001. 3. The Sub Registrar, Nilakottai Sub Registration Office, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of refusal check slip passed by the third respondent in his proceedings in RFL/Nilakottai/1/2023 dated 08.02.2023 2 W.P.(MD)NO.7003 OF 2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the third respondent to register the sale certificate dated 08.08.2022 issued by the second respondent without reference to the commercial tax arrears payable to the first respondent by the original borrower within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Kirubakaran For R-1 : Mr.Amjad Khan, Government Advocate. For R-2 & R-3 : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate. * * *
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.