VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.G.Nandhakumar v. The Supeirntendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 March 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 5915/2023

Judgment

O RDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction to the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of petitioner's representation, dated 25.03.2023.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that promising to arrange Job, the petitioner has alleged to have received money from the fourth respondent, over which only, they have given the complaint. The same was registered in C.S.R.No.62 of 2023. Summon has laso been issued to the petitioner. If it so, the petitioner shall appear before the third respondent and co-operate with him to complete the process of enquiry. On the basis of the out come of the enquiry, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings.

3.With the above said directions and liberty, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

30.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM To

1.The 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thaathaiyangarpettai Police Station, Trichy District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM

30.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5915 of 2023 K.G.Nandhakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thaathaiyangarpettai Police Station, Trichy District. 4.Sivanatham ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of petitioner's representation, dated 25.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for R1 to R3 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.