G. Arokiasamy v. The Dist. Collector

ORDER It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the amount has already been disbursed, nothing survives for consideration in the above writ petition.

2.Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Speaking : Yes / No

19.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Block Development Officer, R.S.Mangalam Panchayat Union, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Joint Director of Agriculture, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

P.T.ASHA, J. mm

19.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA G.Arokiasamy ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Block Development Officer, R.S.Mangalam Panchayat Union, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Agricultural Insurance Company of India Ltd., Old No.156, New No.323, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai 600 001. 4.The Ramanathapuram District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., R.S.Mangalam Branch, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Joint Director of Agriculture, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the Insurance Claim Amount in respect of petitioner's Agricultural Crops cultivated in the property comprised in S.Nos.107/6A, 110/1A, 121/2B,, 145/4L, 127/1C, 127/1F, 127/1M, 138/8 and 143/6, Bagavathi Mangalam Village, Thiruvadanai Taluk admeasuring 0.92.0 Hectares, which was insured under the Agricultural Insurance Scheme 2016-2017. For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For R1, R2 & R5 : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.D.Srinivasaragavan For R4 : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathy