- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9684/2021
Judgment
O RDER
This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to take action against the second and third respondents based on the representation made by the petitioner on 15.02.2021.
2.The case of the petitioner is that the loan was issued in the name of his father by the second and third respondents and that they charged exorbitant interest. That apart, they are continuing to maintain the loan account in the name of the father, who had died as early as on 24.03.2019. The further grievance of the petitioner is that for the meagre loan that was given in the name of the father of the petitioner, an attempt was made by the second and third respondents to grab the valuable property. In view of the same, the petitioner gave a representation to the first respondent to take action against the second and third respondents. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition was filed before this Court.
3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the second and third respondents proceeded further by issuing notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and this notice became the subject matter of a challenge before this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 15450 of 2021. That Writ Petition was allowed by an order dated 27.08.2021 and liberty was granted to the second and third respondents to issue fresh notice to the legal heirs of the deceased.
4.Pursuant to the above order, the second and third respondents have proceeded to issue fresh notice dated 21.04.2023 under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. Now, the notice has been issued to the legal heirs of the deceased and accordingly, notice has been served on the petitioner and his sister.
5.In view of the above, it is left open to the petitioner to agitate his grievance before the proper forum by raising all the grounds. This Writ Petition is disposed of with this direction. No costs.
17.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta
17.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH B.Kamaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, No.16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai. 2.The Managing Director, APTUS Value Housing Finance India Ltd, Corporate Office, No.8-B, Doshi Towers, 205, Poonamalle High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai. 3.The Manager, APTUS Value Housing Finance India Ltd., Door No.114/7G, First Floor, Kandapuram Street, Virudhunagar District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to take necessary action as against the second and third respondents based on the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2021 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mariappan For R3 : Mr.V.Sukumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.