N.Mariyal v. The State of Tamilnadu

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) The petitioner is the mother of the detenu, by name, Saran, aged about 20 years, S/o. Nadarajan. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in No.80/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025, dated 11.11.2025, holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

¶2We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

¶3Apart from the other grounds that were raised by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, one of the main ground that was raised is that the Detaining Authority was aware of the fact that no bail petition was pending as on the date of passing of the detention order. But, however, the Detaining Authority has relied upon the order passed in Crl.M.P.

(MD).No.795 of 2023 dated 23.01.2023 and came to a conclusion that bail has been granted in a similar case and therefore, there is likelihood of the detenu coming out on bail. The learned counsel submitted that the order that was relied upon by the Detaining Authority is not a similar case and therefore, the detention order suffers from non-application of mind.

¶4We have carefully gone through the order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 795 of 2023 dated 23.01.2023. There is no indication in that order that there were previous cases against the accused therein. However, in the case in hand, the detenu had five adverse cases apart from the ground case. Therefore, the order that was relied upon by the Detaining Authority does not arise out of a similar case and consequently, the detention order suffers from non-application of mind.

¶5In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in No.80/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025, dated 11.11.2025, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Saran, aged about 20 years, S/o. Nadarajan, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case.

(N.A.V.,J..) (K.K.R.K.,J.,)

29.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TSG To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

TSG

H.C.P.(MD)No.330 of 2026

29.04.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.330 of 2026 N.Mariyal .. Petitioner / mother of the detenu Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. .. Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the entire records of pertaining to the order of detention dated 11.11.2025 passed by the second respondent in order No.80/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu or body of the detenu, namely, the petitioner's son, i.e., Saran, aged about 20 years, S/o. Nadarajan, now detained at the Central Prison, Palayamkottai, before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor