VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kumar v. The Sub Inspector of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 March 2023
Bench
K.Murali Shankarauthor
Case no.
CRL RC(MD) 368/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This Criminal Revision Petition is directed against the condition No.(i) imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kaniyakumari at Nagercoil, in the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.541 of 2023, dated 24.01.2023.

¶2The petitioner claims to be the owner of the Tipper Tempo bearing Registration No.TN-59-F-6622. On 15.12.2022, the respondent police intercepted the vehicle viz., Tipper Tempo bearing Registration No.TN-59-F-6622 and seized the vehicle as the same was used for transporting of sand illegally without any valid license or permit and registered a case in Crime No.592 of 2022 for the offences under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

¶3It is not in dispute that the petitioner has approached the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, for returning of the said vehicle in Cr.M.P.No.541 of 2023 and the learned Principal Sessions Judge, vide order dated 24.01.2023, has allowed the petition with certain conditions that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- with two solvent sureties (solvency certificate to be obtained from the concerned Deputy Tahsildar) each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel and the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- before the concerned Court and on compliance of the condition, the above vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN-59-F-6622 shall be returned to the petitioner on interim custody. Challenging the above said condition, the above Criminal Revision came to be filed before this Court.

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶5The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's vehicle was never involved in any illegal activity and the respondent police without verifying the same has foisted the above false case. He would further submit that the petitioner's family is depending upon the income deprived from the above said vehicle.

¶6The main grievances of the petitioner is that the conditions imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge in directing the petitioner to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- with two solvent sureties (solvency certificate to be obtained from the concerned Deputy Tahsildar) is onerous and that the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated due to the exposure to sun and rain.

¶7Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner's vehicle was not involved in any other case and also taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the condition No.(i) imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge is onerous, this Court is inclined to modify the condition.

¶8In the result, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed. The order of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, made in Cr.M.P.No.541 of 2021, dated 24.01.2023 is modified in respect of the condition No.(i) alone and it is modified to the effect that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) as non-refundable for the vehicle to the credit of the District Mineral Foundation Trust, Kanniyakumari District and on compliance of the condition, the above vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN-59-F-6622 shall be returned to the petitioner on interim custody on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) with two sureties for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. In respect of other conditions, the order of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, shall remain unaltered.

31.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das

To

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Kanniyakumari.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J. Crl.R.C.(MD)No.368 of 2023

31.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.368 of 2023 Kumar ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. The State rep.by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Kanniyakumari District. (Crime No.592 of 2022) ...Respondent/Respondent Prayer : This Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside and modify the first condition of the order in Crl.M.P.No.541 of 2023 in Crime No.592 of 2022, dated 24.01.2023, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kaniyakumari at Nagercoil. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Muneeswaran For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.