Gokulakannan v. The District Collector

O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2When the matter was hearing on 24.04.2023, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that during the course of enquiry, the fourth respondent undertook to take care of the petitioner. So, on that ground, notice was ordered to the fourth respondent.

¶3Mr.K.M.Karunakaran, learned counsel, appeared for the fourth respondent would submit that now both are living together and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the matter is settled out of the Court. There was settlement between the parties, by which, the above said settled among themselves.

¶4In view of the above said development, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

19.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Ls To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, District Collector Officer, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001.

2.The Commissioner, Commissioner of Differently Abled Persons, Lady Wellington College Campus, Chennai.

3.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Police, Tiruchirappalli.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J Ls Dated : 19.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Gokulakannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, District Collector Officer, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001. 2.The Commissioner, Commissioner of Differently Abled Persons, Lady Wellington College Campus, Chennai. 3.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Police, Tiruchirappalli. 4.Amudha ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to dispose of the representation, dated 04.01.2023, which was forwarded to the third respondent vide Na.Ka.No.124/Law division/2023, dated 22.02.2023 by the second respondent and consequently, to take steps under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, to protect the life of the petitioner within a time period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to 3 : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran for R4