Murugan v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] The complaint of the petitioner is that his daughter has eloped with the third respondent, who is his brother's son.

¶2Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 has produced a letter, dated 20.03.2023, addressed by the petitioner's daughter to the Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, stating that she has married the third respondent and they are living at Hyderabad. Address and phone number of the petitioner's daughter have also been disclosed in the said letter. Photographs showing them living as husband and wife have also been produced.

¶3Though the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the third respondent is within the prohibited degree of relationship and the marriage is invalid, the petitioner's daughter being a major, we do not think we can entertain this habeas corpus petition, more so, when she is living with someone she likes on her own volition.

¶4Hence, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

05.04.2023 Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, Virudhunagar.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk H.C.P.(MD) No.450 of 2023

05.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI H.C.P.(MD) No.450 of 2023 Murugan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District 2.The Inspector of Police Virudhunagar West Police Station Virudhunagar 3.Alagar ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the petitioner daughter / detenue Kalaiselvi, daughter of Murugan, aged about 28 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vishnu For Respondents : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2