VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Hariharan .S v. The District Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8532/2022

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner with a grievance that his representation dated

21.04.2022 has not been considered has filed this writ petition.

¶2When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 by referring the written instructions of the Tahsildar, Virudhunagar submitted that the petitioner's representation was duly considered and was rejected by order dated 05.08.2023. A copy of the order has also been furnished before this Court as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶3Recording the submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, this writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the rejection order in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No.

21.09.2023 Internet:Yes am To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar.

3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Virudhunagar District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. am W.P(MD)No.8532 of 2022

21.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.8532 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)No.6270 of 2022 S.Hariharan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar. 3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Virudhunagar District. 4.Gnanasundari ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing the fourth respondent herein not to make the construction over the disputed property in Natham S.No.766/56 to the extent of 0.00.72 sq.met Sengundrapuram, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District and consider the petitioner's representations dated 21.02.2022 and 21.04.2022. For Petitioner :Mr.G.Mariappan For R1 to R3 :Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate For R4 : Mr.G.Aravinthan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.