VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Gomu M v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd.,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7607/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The writ petitioner's husband was employed as Special Grade Conductor in the respondent Corporation. He died on 03.12.2020. However, his terminal benefits were settled only on 01.12.2022. It is well settled that for such belated settlement, the employee is entitled to interest. I therefore direct the respondent Corporation to pay the interest to the writ petitioner computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated disbursement from the date of immediately after the death of her husband till date of settlement. The interest amount shall be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶3This writ petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

05.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Limited, Tirunelveli.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Limited, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

05.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Gomu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Tirunelveli. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Limited, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum for the belated payment of petitioner's terminal benefits of petitioner's husband Late P.Murugan including Provident Fund, Gratuity from the date of his death to till the date on which the said benefits were settled to her. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.D.Jebaraj Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.