VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

D.Shanmugapriya v. The State of Tamilnadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
HCP(MD) 359/2026

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) The petitioner is the wife of the detenu viz., Devanesan @ Deva, aged about 27 years, s/o. Senthattikalaipandian. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in M.H.S.Confdl No.74/2025 dated

30.09.2025 holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

¶2We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

¶3Apart from the other grounds that were raised by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, one of the main ground that was raised by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the Detaining Authority while relying upon the bail order passed in Crl.M.P.No.3689 of 2021 has relied upon the English version of the order and whereas in the paper book that was served on the detenu, the Tamil version did not contain the entire translation of the order and hence, the detenu was not able to make an effective representation.

¶4On carefully going through the Tamil version of the order that is available in page no.241 of the paper book, it is seen that the bail order has not been translated completely and that the most relevant portions of the bail order has not even been translated. Hence, the detenu was not in a position to make an effective representation. As a consequence, the detention order stands vitiated.

¶5In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in M.H.S.Confdl No.74/2025 dated 30.09.2025 passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Devanesan @ Deva, aged about 27 years, s/o. Senthattikalaipandian, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case.

(N.A.V.,J..) (K.K.R.K.,J.,)

15.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TSG To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Chennai-600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J. TSG

H.C.P.(MD)No.359 of 2026

15.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.359 of 2026 D.Shanmugapriya .. Petitioner / Wife of the detenu Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. .....Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records pertaining to the proceedings of the second respondent made in his proceedings in M.H.S.Confdl No.74/2025 dated 30.09.2025 on the file of the second respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu or body of the detenu namely the petitioner's husband, i.e., Devanesan @ Deva, aged about 27 years, s/o. Senthattikalaipandian, now detained at the Central Prison, Palayamkottai, before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.