VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vaithialingam v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 December 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 8116/2022

Judgment

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for records relating to the FIR in Crime No.21 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as against the petitioners/ accused No.2 and 5 is concerned.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that after completing the investigation, the FIR in Crime No.21 of 2020 was closed as mistake of fact. RCS notice was also served upon the defacto complainant.

¶3In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Petition has become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

06.12.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu To

1.The Inspector of Police, All Woman Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8116 of 2022

06.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8116 of 2022 1.Vaithiyalingam 2.Rajendran ... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 and 5 Vs. State rep by its: 1.The Inspector of Police, All Woman Police Station, Musiri, (Crime No.21/2020) Trichy District. ...1st Respondent/Respondent 2.Priyadharshini ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for records relating to the FIR in Crime No.21 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as against the petitioners/ accused No.2 and 5 is concerned. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Subash Babu For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.M.Chandrabose

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.