- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 March 2026
- Bench
- D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7558/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2025.
¶2Heard Mr.S.Manohar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.B.Karunanithi, learned counsel, who takes notice for R3.
¶3This Court perused the representation of the petitioners dated
14.12.2025. Relevant portion of the said representation reads as follows:- "In the circumstances stated above we want to raise the issue of the illegality of the AGM conducted without quorum and request your goodself to declare that the AGM proceedings are null and void and also declare that the removal proceedings are devoid of any merits. We further request you that the present set of office bearers should be removed from their posts for their illegal actions and for giving false statements before a Public authority."
¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that no Form-7 yet has been submitted by the office bearers.
¶5The learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that the petitioner's removal was made in accordance with law.
¶6By reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that they are further proceeding with the conduct of the meeting also.
¶7With reference to the issue, it has already been settled that the 2nd respondent shall have the power of enquiry only insofar as it relates to the filing of a Form-7 or any other prescribed forms before the 2nd respondent. With respect to the validity of the Annual General Body Meeting, or the removal or conduct of fresh removal it is for the parties to approach the Competent Civil Court.
¶8Accordingly, while keeping open the liberty of the petitioner to approach the Competent Civil Court and seek any emergent relief before the same, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
18.03.2026 Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes rgm To
¶1The DIG of Registration, TNAU Nagar, Rajagambeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai - 625 107.
¶2The District Registrar (Administration), Madurai (South), TNAU Nagar, Rajagambeeram, Y.Othakadai Madurai - 625 107.
¶3Agrini Enclave Houses and Flats, Owners Association, through its Secretary, Andalpuram, Madurai - 625 003.
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. rgm and W.M.P(MD).Nos.6205 and 6206 of 2026
18.03.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD).Nos.6205 and 6206 of 2026 1. R.Vijayalakshmi. 2. S.Narayanan 3. M.Devika 4. V.Narayanan 5. B.Vel Thiagarajan ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The DIG of Registration, TNAU Nagar, Rajagambeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai - 625 107. 2. The District Registrar (Administration), Madurai (South), TNAU Nagar, Rajagambeeram, Y.Othakadai Madurai - 625 107. 3. Agrini Enclave Houses and Flats, Owners Association, through its Secretary, Andalpuram, Madurai - 625 003. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioners dated 14.12.2025 in respect of their Membership in 3rd Respondent Association as their dismissal of Petitioners were illegal and against the provisions of Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act 1975 and Association Bye-laws within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court and pass such other or further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Manohar For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.B.Karunanithi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.