VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Urkalan M v. The District Registrar (Administration)

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 October 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8781/2022

Judgment

O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2At the instance of the third respondent, the first respondent had characterised document Nos.2041/1990, 3369/2004 and 153/2005 on the file of the second respondent as fraudulent. Admittedly, there is no impersonation. The first respondent has rather gone into the title issue. It is seen that the petitioner has already filed O.S.No.41 of 2022 on the file of the Sub Judge, Theni, seeking the relief of declaration and permanent injunction. The third respondent figures as the defendant in the suit. Therefore, the first respondent was not justified in passing the impugned order.

¶3In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set 3 W.P.(MD)NO.8781 OF 2022 aside. This writ petition stands allowed. The rights of parties will abide by the outcome of the civil suit. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

09.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:

¶1The District Registrar (Administration), Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶2The Sub Registrar, Aandipatti, Theni District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.8781 OF 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.8781 of 2022

09.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.8781 OF 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.8781 of 2022 AND W.M.P.(MD)Nos.6390 & 6392 of 2022 M.Urkalan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Registrar (Administration), Periyakulam, Theni District. 2. The Sub Registrar, Aandipatti, Theni District. 3. Pandiyarajan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent dated 24.03.2022 passed in her proceedings in Na.Ka.No.5454/E2/2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the second respondent to remove the entries insofar as 5 cents of lands in S.No.432/2A is concerned made in the index of register maintained by him. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.8781 OF 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sukumar For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate. For R-3 : Mr.S.Abdul Rahman * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.