- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 April 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7634/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The petitioner is the wife of one V.Karuppasamy. The said V.Karuppasamy was a temple employee. He retired in the year 2008. He passed away in the year 2015. The petitioner seeks payment of family pension. A scheme appears to have been framed recently in this regard. In any event, the learned Standing Counsel for the temple informs the Court that the petitioner's case has been recommended. The first respondent is directed to pass an order on the petition mentioned proposal for conferment of the family pension of the petitioner within a period of six weeks. I do not see any difficulty for the first respondent to give his approval. In any event, the entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
05.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA
To The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Office, Nungambakkam, Chennai.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
05.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.Kuppammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Office, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Arulmigu Baladhandayuthapani Swamy Temple, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Office, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Baladhandayuthapani Swamy Temple, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Office, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay all service, monetary and attendant benefits including salary arrears and Family Pension to the petitioner within a time period to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Gokulnaath For Respondents : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate for R.1 Mr.K.Govindarajan Standing Counsel for R.2 & R.3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.