- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 September 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL RC(MD) 262/2019
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal revision case is dismissed as withdrawn.
22.09.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gns To
1.The Fast Track, Mahila Court, Dindigul, Dindigul, District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL
,J.
gns
22.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.RC..(MD)No.262 of 2019 Jeyanthi ... Petitioner Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District. (In Cr.No.107 of 2015) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and set aside the orders in Cr.M.P.No.1439 of 2018 dated 07.02.2019 in S.C.No.255 of 2018 on the file of the learned Fast Track, Mahila Court, Dindigul, Dindigul, District as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Prasanna Rajadurai For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.