- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 January 2026
- Bench
- N.Senthilkumar
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1017/2024
Judgment
ORDER Heard Mr. D.Kamachi Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. C.Karthikeyan, learned Counsel for the Respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleading of the parties.
¶2This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed to expedite the disposal in I.D. No. 53 of 2013 on the file of the Labour Court, Tirunelveli (hereinafter referred to as the 'Trial Court' for short).
¶3This Court, during earlier hearing on 18.04.2024, had passed the following order:- "2. The Labour Court, Tirunelveli shall send a report as to whether there is any impediment for conducting further proceedings in I.D. No. 53 of 2013 and if so, explain the reasons for the same, before the next hearing."
¶4In furtherance to the said order, the Trial Court has sent a report dated 15.05.2024, which reads as follows:- "I humbly submit that I.D. 53/2013 was ripe of Enquiry even on 05.02.2014. But thereafter I.A. No. 46/2014 was filed and the same was allowed on 21.03.2014 and as against the said order appeal has been preferred and further proceedings was stayed till January 2018 and thereafter case was posted for enquiry. But the petitioner did not get alongwith enquiry and marked documents till January 2024 and thereafter documents were produced and marked on both side and posted for arguments on preliminery issue. Since the case pertains to Tuticorin District, and I was placed incharge as Full Additional Charge for Labour Court, I used to attend Camp Court only on 3rd Wednesday of every month and after hearing of arguments case was posted for order on preliminary issue and thereafter reopened for clarification regarding the preliminary issue aspect and both side yet to address this court on the point of clarification and once both side addressed this court the case can be reserved for orders on preliminary issue and if both side agreed to contest the case on merit there is no impediment in final disposal of this case once both parties let in evidence on merit."
¶5On perusal of the above, there shall be a direction to the Labour Court, Tirunelveli, to dispose of the I.D. No.53 of 2013, within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. No costs.
21.01.2026
(½) NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No Indu To
1.The Labour Court, Tirunelveli.
2.The Registrar (Judicial), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. Indu
21.01.2026
(½)
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR U.Madhavan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Administration, M/s.Southern Petro Chemicals Industries, Corporation Limited, Spic Nagar, Thoothukudi-628 005. Tamil Nadu. 2.The Administration, M/s.Southern Petro Chemicals Industries, Corporation Limited, Registered Office, No.88, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Court below to dispose of I.D. No. 53 of 2013 on the file of the Labour Court, Tirunelveli within the time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Kamachi For Respondents : Mr.C.Karthikeyan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.