- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 July 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL RC(MD) 359/2019
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned cousel appearing for the petitioner has represented that already the matter has been settled between the parties and now, they are living together. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal revision case is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
13.07.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gns To The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District.
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5375 of 2019 Thomas ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Arul Gracy @ Karthiga 2.Mathivathani 3.Nirmal ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order dated 28.03.2019 made in Cr.M.P.No.1398 of 2018 in M.C.No.5 of 2018 in the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District and allow the above revision petition. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vishnu For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Sevugaraja P. DHANABAL ,J. gns
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.