- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 April 2023
- Bench
- P.Vadamalai
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 130/2019
Judgment
ORDER Today (11.04.2023), when the matter is taken up for hearing it is represented by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners that the main suit in O.S.No.58 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court, Theni has been ''dismissed for default'' on 04.09.2019 and hence, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners seek liberty to file a petition to restore the Civil Revision Petition before this Court in the event of the suit in O.S.No.58 of 2017 being restored before the Court below.
3.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a petition to restore the Civil Revision Petition before this Court in the event, if the suit in O.S.No.58 of 2017 being restored before the lower Court. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
11.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No vsd To
1.The Additional District Court, Theni.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd
and C.M.P(MD)No.598 of 2019
11.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.598 of 2019 1.Peter @ Alagu Peter 2.Shirly Cracencia 3.Selvam 4.Benitto Paulraj 5.Sebasthiammal 6.Selvi ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Baskaran 2.John Issac 3.Jamila Ruby Mehal ... Respondents PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set-aside the fair and decreetal order dated 19.12.2018 made in I.A.No.21 of 2018 in I.A.No.67 of 2016 in O.S.No.58 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court, Theni. For Petitioners : Mr.V.George Raja for M/s.Ajmal Associates For R1 - R2 : Mr.M.Natarajan For R3 : Mr.K.Appadurai
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.