VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Shanmugam v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 1682/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to ensure and permit the petitioner and the other devotees to peacefully participate in all the functions, rituals, arrangements and activities of the forthcoming temple Kodai festival at Senbagaramanallur Village, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District, and consequently forbear the respondent No.5 and his associates from in any manner obstructing or interfering with such participation.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the 5th respondent is obstructing the petitioner and his group from participating in the aforesaid temple festival. In this regard, they have given a representation on

24.01.2026 to the respondent police and the same is pending.

¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents submitted that the petitioner and the fifth respondent are leaders of two rival groups, each claiming the right to conduct the festival. It was further submitted that the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, is the appropriate authority to convene a peace committee in this regard.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials placed before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondent, notice to him is dispensed with.

¶5In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District, is suo motu impleaded as the 6th respondent, for whom, Mr.C.Satheesh, learned Government Advocate takes notice.

¶6Considering the fact and circumstances of this case, the sixth respondent is directed to conduct a peace committee between the petitioner's group and the 5th respondent's group on 07.05.2026 and pass appropriate orders facilitating the conduct of temple festival in the peaceful manner.

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

26.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm Note: Issue order copy on 29.04.2026. TO:-

¶1The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Collector Office, Tirunelveli.

¶2The Tasilthar, O/o. Tasilthar - Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

¶3The Village Administrative Officer, Senbagaramanallur, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶4The Inspector of Police, Moolaikaraipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶5The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

¶6The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Dated

26.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI M.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Collector Office, Tirunelveli. 2. The Tasilthar, O/o. Tasilthar - Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District. 3. The Village Administrative Officer, Senbagaramanallur, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Moolaikaraipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 5. Muthukutty Asari 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents (R6 is suo motu impleaded vide order of this Court dated 26.03.2026 in this petition.) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 4 to ensure and permit the petitioner and the other devotees to peacefully participate in all the functions, rituals, arrangements and activities of the forthcoming temple Kodai festival at Senbagaramanallur Village, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District, and consequently forbear the respondent No.5 and his associates from in any manner obstructing or interfering with such participation. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sangeetha Sri For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh (R1 to R3 & R6) Government Advocate (Civil) Mr.S.Ravi (R4) Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.