VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Ramila v. P.Prabhu

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 October 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 324/2019

Judgment

O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 05.01.2019 passed in I.A.No.177 of 2016 in G.W.O.P.No.3 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.

¶2This Court called for the report from the concerned Principal District Judge, by order dated 19.10.2023 with regard to the status of the G.W.O.P.No.3 of 2016 in the trial Court. Accordingly, the concerned Principal District Judge, has sent a report wherein, it is stated that the Guardian Wards Original Petition in G.W.O.P.No.3 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai, is dismissed for default, by its order, dated 31.10.2022.

¶3In view of the above, as already the G.W.O.P.No.3 of 2016 itself is dismissed for default, in the considered opinion of this Court, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶4Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶5No costs.

¶6Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

31.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RM To The Judge, Family Court, Madurai.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM C.R.P(MD) No.324 of 2019

31.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND C.R.P(MD) No.324 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD) No.1558 of 2019 P.Ramila ...Petitioner Vs. P.Prabhu ...Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 05.01.2019 passed in I.A.No.177 of 2016 in G.W.O.P.No.3 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai, and allow this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondent : Mr.C.M.Arumugam

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.