Thirunavukarasu, v. Dhasarathan,

O R D E R On two previous occasions ie., on 14.09.2023 & 19.09.2023, when this case was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this case was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'.

¶2Today, the learned counsel for the first respondent is present. Despite this case being listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

22.09.2023 Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No jen Page No. 2 of 4 To The Sub Judge, Ramanathapuram. Page No. 3 of 4 C.R.P.(Mi)oNo.517oofo2019 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. jen C.R.P.(MD)oNo.517oofo2019 andoC.M.P.(MD)oNo.2573oofo2019

22.09.2023 PageoNo.o4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and C.M.P.(MD) No.2573 of 2019 Thirunavukarasu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Dhasarathan 2.Mariya Gunaseeli Anthony Sahaya Gilta (died) 3.Santhiyagu @ Mookupuri Santhiyagu 4.Minor Antojohn 5.Minor Yosafath 4th and 5th respondents are represented by Court Guardian Advocate Mr.G.Kesavan Ramanathapuram Bar Association, Ramanathpuram. ... Respondents Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 18.12.2018 passed in I.A.No.634 of 2018 in O.S.No.145 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram. Page No. 1 of 4 For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.S.Prabhu For R2 to R8 : No appearance