VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Nageshwari V v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8031/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent temple.

¶2The respondent temple is running an unaided private school in the name and style of Arulmighu Palaniandavar Matriculation Higher Secondary School. The petitioner herein is working in the said school on consolidated pay basis. The petitioner seeks regularization and permanent appointment. The petition mentioned representation has been given.

¶3The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

11.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Chennai-34.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

11.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.Nageshwari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Chennai-34. 2.The Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Samy Thirukovil, Palani-624 601. 3.The Correspondent, Arulmighu Palaniandavar Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Palani-624 601. 4.The Principal, Arulmighu Palaniandavar Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Palani-624 601. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to appoint the petitioner in the permanent vacant post as a history teacher in the third respondent school in the two available vacancies presently, based on the petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate for R1 : Mr.K.Govindarajan for R2 to R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.