VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

C.Mayakkal v. The District Collector

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 April 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 7840/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned counsel, takes notice for the fourth respondent.

¶2With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶3It is the complaint of the petitioner that she has put up a dwelling

house

in Survey

Nos.1255/2A

1257/1A, Vadaveeranayakkanpatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District-625 531, measuring about 2.5 Cents.

¶4According to the petitioner, she purchased the said property under a registered sale deed, dated 04.11.2020, from one Anbazhagan. She had also applied for grant of patta. While so, the Authorities claiming that the property is a poramboke land have started fencing of her house, thereby denying access to her house. The petitioner would also contend that she is entitled to free house site patta under the scheme proposed by the Government. She would further contend that the patta that was granted to her vendor was cancelled by order dated 23.09.2021.

¶5It is seen from the order of this Court dated 08.10.2021 that the order cancelling the patta has been set aside at the instance of eleven other persons, who were similarly placed.

¶6In view of above, we find that the action of the official respondents in attempting to fence the land in possession of the petitioner is not legal. If the petitioner is occupant of the Government land and she is not entitled to free house site patta, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, for removal of the encroachment. Fencing of a property belonging to the petitioner would amount to infraction of her right to live, which is a fundamental right.

¶7Hence, the writ petition is allowed. There will be a mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from erecting a fence around the house of the petitioner, thereby denying access to her house. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

06.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.

3.The Thashildar, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District. R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk W.M.P.(MD) No.7260 of 2023

06.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.M.P.(MD) No.7260 of 2023 C.Mayakkal ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector Theni District Theni 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Periyakulam Theni District 3.The Thashildar Periyakulam Taluk Theni District 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Theni ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from fencing the dwelling house of the petitioner situated in Survey No.1255/2A and 1257/1A, Vadaveeranayakkanpatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District-625 531. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Deenadhayalan for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.