Sasikumar v. The Inspector of Police

ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioners based on considering the petitioner representation dated 30.03.2023 under the guise of enquiry.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry was conducted. But the complainant did not appear and thess petitioners appeared and stated that they will workout their remedy through Family Court. On that ground the above said complaint was closed.

3.In view of the above said submission, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

09.06.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District

¶2The Inspector of Police Station, All Women Police Station Puliankudi, Tenkasi District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

09.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1. Sasikumar 2. Muthulakshmi .... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District 2.The Inspector of Police Station, All Women Police Station Puliankudi, Tenkasi District. (Crime No. Not Known of 2023) 3. Ms. Selvarasathi. ... Respondents (R3 is suo motu impleaded in this case as per the order of this Court dt. 10.04.2023) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, directing the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioner based on considering the petitioner representation dated 30.03.2023, under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Muthuvelan For Respondents : Mr.S. Manikandan for R1 & R2 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Mr. R.J. Karthik for R3