Pandaram v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the Respondent No.2 to not to harass the petitioner in guise of enquiry.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent herein enquiry has been undertaken in C.P.No.270 of 2023. It is found that it is a money transaction issue between the parties. Over which a suit is also pending before the competent civil Court. Hence, the complaint has been closed. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. The matter has become infructuous.

3.In view of the above said submission, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

10.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

10.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.04.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Pandaram ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi. ...1st Respondent 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ...2nd Respondent 3.Pappathi ...3rd Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the Respondent No.2 to not to harass the petitioner in guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.Prabha.S For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor