VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Iyyer v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 6476/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioners in the name of enquiry in the alleged compliant given by the 3rd and 4th Respondents.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the respondent enquiry was undertaken in C.P.No.697 of 2022. During the course of enquiry it was found that it is the issue between the parties over drawing of water from the common Well. Finding that it is a civil dispute between the parties, they were advised to workout their remedy through appropriate civil proceedings. With the above said advise the enquiry was closed.

3.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, nothing survives in this case for further adjudication. The matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

10.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. .

2.The Inspector of Police, Nilakottai Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

10.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.04.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1.S.Iyyer 2.Thangapandi @ Pillaiyan 3.Mottaikida@Chinnappan ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ...1st Respondent 2.The Inspector of Police, Nilakottai Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. ...2nd Respondent 3.Chinnaraj ...3rd Respondent 4.Aatichimuthu ...4th Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioners in the name of enquiry in the alleged compliant given by the 3rd and 4th Respondents. For Petitioners : Mr.Rajesh Saravanan.B For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.