Abishek .M v. The Inspector General of Registration

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner wants the petition mentioned document to be cancelled. If the Larger Bench holds that Section 77A is retrospective, the petitioner can definitely pursue the complaint. The second respondent is directed to keep the petitioner's complaint pending. Based on the decision of the Larger Bench, the second respondent will take a call.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mandavalipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai-60028.

2.The District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3.The Sub Registrar, Kallimandayam Sub Registration Office, Dindigul District-624 204.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

14.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.6506 of 2022 M.Abishek ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mandavalipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai-60028. 2.The District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The Sub Registrar, Kallimandayam Sub Registration Office, Dindigul District-624 204. (R3 name amended vide order dated 08.03.2023 in W.M.P.(MD)No.13031 of 2022) 4.R.Dhanaraj 5.Ponnuthayee ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to consider the Petitioners representation dated 22.04.2022 and cancel the registration of the sale deed dated 26.07.2017 bearing registration No.744/17. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunnithy For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3